Mapping the Discharge Process After Surgery.

Importance: Care transition models are structured approaches used to ensure the smooth transfer of patients between health care settings or levels of care, but none currently are tailored to the surgical patient. Tailoring care transition models to the unique needs of surgical patients may lead to significant improvements in surgical outcomes and reduced care fragmentation. The first step to developing surgical care transition models is to understand the surgical discharge process. Objective: To map the surgical discharge process in a sample of US hospitals and identify key components and potential challenges specific to a patient's discharge after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study followed a cognitive task analysis framework conducted between January 1, 2022, and April 1, 2023, in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals. Observations (n = 16) of discharge from inpatient care after a surgical procedure were conducted in 2 separate VHA surgical units. Interviews (n = 13) were conducted among VHA health care professionals nationwide. Exposure: Postoperative hospital discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data were coded according to the principles of thematic analysis, and a swim lane process map was developed to represent the study findings. Results: At the hospitals in this study, the discharge process observed for a surgical patient involved multidisciplinary coordination across the surgery team, nursing team, case managers, dieticians, social services, occupational and physical therapy, and pharmacy. Important components for a surgical discharge that were not incorporated in the current care transition models included wound care education and supplies; pain control; approvals for nonhome postdischarge locations; and follow-up plans for wounds, ostomies, tubes, and drains at discharge. Potential challenges to the surgical discharge process included social situations (eg, home environment and caregiver availability), team communication issues, and postdischarge care coordination. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that current and ongoing studies of discharge care transitions for a patient after surgery should consider pain control; wounds, ostomies, tubes, and drains; and the impact of challenging social situations and interdisciplinary team coordination on discharge success.

Predictors of amputation-free survival and wound healing after infrainguinal bypass with alternative conduits.

OBJECTIVE: Inadequate vein quality or prior harvest precludes use of autologous single segment greater saphenous vein (ssGSV) in many patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Predictors of patient outcome after infrainguinal bypass with alternative (non-ssGSV) conduits are not well-understood. We explored whether limb presentation, bypass target, and conduit type were associated with amputation-free survival (AFS) after infrainguinal bypass using alternative conduits. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study (2013-2020) was conducted of 139 infrainguinal bypasses performed for CLTI with cryopreserved ssGSV (cryovein) (n = 71), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (n = 23), or arm/spliced vein grafts (n = 45). Characteristics, Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage, and outcomes were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and classification and regression tree analysis modeled predictors of AFS. RESULTS: Within 139 cases, the mean age was 71 years, 59% of patients were male, and 51% of cases were nonelective. More patients undergoing bypass with cryovein were WIfI stage 4 (41%) compared with PTFE (13%) or arm/spliced vein (27%) (P = .04). Across groups, AFS at 2 years was 78% for spliced/arm, 79% for PTFE, and 53% for cryovein (adjusted hazard ratio for cryovein, 2.5; P = .02). Among cases using cryovein, classification and regression tree analysis showed that WIfI stage 3 or 4, age >70 years, and prior failed bypass were predictive of the lowest AFS at 2 years of 36% vs AFS of 58% to 76% among subgroups with less than two of these factors. Although secondary patency at 2 years was worse in the cryovein group (26% vs 68% and 89% in arm/spliced and PTFE groups; P < .01), in patients with tissue loss there was no statistically significant difference in wound healing in the cryovein group (72%) compared with other bypass types (72% vs 87%, respectively; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CLTI lacking suitable ssGSV, bypass with autogenous arm/spliced vein or PTFE has superior AFS compared with cryovein, although data were limited for PTFE conduits for distal targets. Despite poor patency with cryovein, wound healing is achieved in a majority of cases, although it should be used with caution in older patients with high WIfI stage and prior failed bypass, given the low rates of AFS.

Development and Validation of a Novel Preoperative Risk Score to Identify Patients at Risk for Nonhome Discharge after Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR).

BACKGROUND: Nonhome discharge (NHD) to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is uncommon. However, NHD after surgery has an important impact on patient quality of life and postdischarge outcomes. Understanding factors that put patients undergoing EVAR at high risk for NHD is essential to providing adequate preoperative counseling and shared decision making. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of NHD following elective EVAR and to create a clinically useful preoperative risk score. METHODS: Elective EVAR cases were queried from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative 2014-2018. A risk score was created by splitting the data set into two-thirds for development and one-third for validation. A parsimonious stepwise hierarchical multivariable logistic regression controlling for hospital level variation was performed in the development dataset, and the beta-coefficients were used to assign points for a risk score. The score was then validated, and model performance assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 24,426 patients were included and 932 (3.8%) required NHD. Multivariable analysis in the development group identified independent predictors of NHD, which were used to create a 20-point risk score. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based upon their risk score: low risk (0-7 points; n = 16,699) with an NHD rate of 1.8%, moderate risk (8-13 points; n = 7,315) with an NHD rate of 7.3%, and high risk (≥14 points; n = 412) with an NHD rate of 21.8%. The risk score had good predictive ability with c-statistic = 0.75 for model development and c-statistic = 0.73 in the validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: This novel risk score can predict NHD following EVAR using characteristics that can be identified preoperatively. Utilization of this score may allow for improved risk assessment, preoperative counseling, and shared decision making.

Decreasing prevalence of centers meeting the Society for Vascular Surgery abdominal aortic aneurysm guidelines in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Based on data supporting a volume-outcome relationship in elective aortic aneurysm repair, the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines recommend that endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) be localized to centers that perform ≥10 operations annually and have a perioperative mortality and conversion-to-open rate of ≤2% and that open aortic repair (OAR) be localized to centers that perform ≥10 open aortic operations annually and have a perioperative mortality ≤5%. However, the number and distribution of centers meeting the SVS criteria remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the temporal trends and geographic distribution of Centers Meeting the SVS Aortic Guidelines (CMAG) in the United States. METHODS: The SVS Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all OAR, aortic bypasses, and EVAR from 2011 to 2019. Annual OAR and EVAR volume, 30-day elective operative mortality for OAR or EVAR, and EVAR conversion-to-open rate for all centers were calculated. The SVS guidelines for OAR and EVAR, individually and combined, were applied to each institution leading to a CMAG designation. The proportion of CMAGs by region (West, Midwest, South, and Northeast) were compared by year using a χ2 test. Temporal trends were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression for CMAG, adjusting by region. RESULTS: Overall, 67,865 patients (49,264 EVAR; 11,010 OAR; 7591 aortic bypasses) at 336 institutions were examined. The proportion of EVAR CMAGs increased nationally by 1.7% annually from 51.6% (n = 33/64) in 2011 to 67.1% (n = 190/283) in 2019 (ß = .05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.09; P = .02). The proportion of EVAR CMAGs across regions ranged from 27.3% to 66.7% in 2011 to 63.9% to 72.9% in 2019. In contrast, the proportion of OAR CMAGs has decreased nationally by 1.8% annually from 32.8% (n = 21/64) in 2011 to 16.3% (n = 46/283) in 2019 (ß = -.14; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.10; P < .01). Combined EVAR and OAR CMAGs were even less frequent and decreased by 1.5% annually from 26.6% (n = 17/64) in 2011 to 13.1% (n = 37/283) in 2019 (ß = -.12; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.07; P < .01). In 2019, there was no significant difference in regional variation of the proportion of combined EVAR and OAR CMAGs (P = .82). CONCLUSIONS: Although an increasing proportion of institutions nationally meet the SVS guidelines for EVAR, a smaller proportion meet them for OAR, with a concerning downward trend. These data question whether we can safely offer OAR at most institutions, have important implications about sufficient OAR exposure for trainees, and support regionalization of OAR.

Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.

BACKGROUND: Online resources are a valuable source of information for patients and have been reported to improve engagement and adherence to medical care. However, readability of online patient educational materials (OPEMs) is crucial for them to serve their intended purpose. The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends that OPEM be written at or below the sixth grade reading level. To avoid disparities in access to comprehensible health information on peripheral artery disease (PAD), it is imperative that the readability of PAD OPEM is appropriate for both English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the readability of PAD OPEM in Spanish and compare to English-language OPEM. METHODS: We conducted a Google search in English and Spanish using "peripheral arterial disease" and "enfermedad arterial periferica", respectively, and the top 25 patient-accessible articles were collected for each. Articles were categorized by source type: hospital, professional society, or other. Readability of English-language OPEM was measured using the Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula, Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, Linsear Write Formula, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. Readability of Spanish OPEM was measured using the Fernández-Huerta Index and Índice Flesch-Szigriszt Scale. Readability of the articles was compared to the AMA recommendation, between English- and Spanish-language, and across sources using statistical tests appropriate to the data. RESULTS: OPEM from professional societies represented the fewest number of English- (n = 7, 28%) and Spanish-language (n = 6, 24%) articles. Most English-speaking (n = 18, 72%) and Spanish-language (n = 20, 80%) OPEM were considered difficult as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Readability Formula and Fernández-Huerta Index, respectively, but did not significantly differ between languages (P = 0.59). There were no significant differences in the average readability of all readability measurements across sources (hospital, professional society, or other). All the average readability grade levels for English-speaking and Spanish-language OPEM was significantly higher than the sixth grade reading level (P < 0.01). Only 3 (6%) OPEM met the AMA recommended reading level and there was no significant difference between English-language and Spanish-language OPEM (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all Spanish-language and English-language PAD OPEM assessed were written at a reading grade level higher than recommended by the AMA. There was no significant difference in the readability of materials from hospitals or professional societies. To prevent further widening of health disparities related to literacy, health content creators, particularly hospitals and professional societies, should prioritize, develop, and ensure that English-language and Spanish-language patient education materials are written at a level appropriate for the public.

Risk factors and associated outcomes of postoperative delirium after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) is a major vascular procedure that incurs a large physiologic demand, increasing the risk for complications such as postoperative delirium (POD). We sought to characterize POD incidence, identify delirium risk factors, and evaluate the effect of delirium on postoperative outcomes. We hypothesized that POD following OAR would be associated with increased postoperative complications and resource utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all OAR cases from 2012 to 2020 at a single tertiary care center. POD was identified via a validated chart review method based on key words and Confusion Assessment Method assessments. The primary outcome was POD, and secondary outcomes included length of stay, non-home discharge, 90-day mortality, and 1-year survival. Bivariate analysis as appropriate to the data was used to assess the association of delirium with postoperative outcomes. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for POD and Cox regression for variables associated with worse 1-year survival. RESULTS: Overall, 198 OAR cases were included, and POD developed in 34% (n = 67). Factors associated with POD included older age (74 vs 69 years; P < .01), frailty (50% vs 28%; P < .01), preoperative dementia (100% vs 32%; P < .01), symptomatic presentation (47% vs 27%; P < .01), preoperative coronary artery disease (44% vs 28%; P = .02), end-stage renal disease (89% vs 32%; P < .01) and Charlson Comorbidity Index score >4 (42% vs 26%; P = .01). POD was associated with 90-day mortality (19% vs 5%; P < .01), non-home discharge (61% vs 30%; P < .01), longer median hospital length of stay (14 vs 8 days; P < .01), longer median intensive care unit length of stay (6 vs 3 days; P < .01), postoperative myocardial infarction (7% vs 2%; P = .045), and postoperative pneumonia (19% vs 8%; P = .01). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for POD included older age, history of end-stage renal disease, lack of epidural, frailty, and symptomatic presentation. A Cox proportional hazards model revealed that POD was associated with worse survival at 1 year (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-9.0; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: POD is associated with worse postoperative outcomes and increased resource utilization. Future studies should examine the role of improved screening, implementation of delirium prevention bundles, and multidisciplinary care for the most vulnerable patients undergoing OAR.

Guideline Compliant Minimum Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Surgeon and Hospital Volume Cutoffs.

BACKGROUND: There is a known association between volume and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A recent analysis suggested rates of stroke and death do not significantly reduce after a surgeon volume cutoff of 20 CEAs per year. However, these results would severely limit access. The objective here is to identify a lower optimal cutpoint for surgeon and hospital volume for asymptomatic CEA. METHODS: We evaluated asymptomatic CEA patients using The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2000-2014. The relationship of 3-year averaged volumes for surgeons and hospitals to 30-day stroke was assessed using multiple logistic regression and included both hospital and surgeon volume in all analyses. Optimized cut points were the lowest significant volume cutoff that minimized the adjusted odds ratio of stroke. RESULTS: We studied 32,549 CEAs performed by 271 surgeons in 136 centers by vascular surgeons. The median surgeon volume was 26.3 (interquartile range: 12.3-51.7) and the median hospital volume was 67 (interquartile range: 36.3-119.3). The surgeon volume cut point was 3 and the hospital volume cut point was 6 cases per year. There were 756 (2.3%) procedures performed by surgeons with a volume < 3 and 560 (1.7%) procedures performed by hospitals with a volume < 6. Perioperative stroke and death rates were 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-2.1) and 3.8% (95% CI: 2.6-5.5) for an average yearly surgeon volume ≥ 3 and < 3 (P = 0.070), respectively. The combined stroke and death rate was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.8-2.1) and 4.8% (95% CI: 3.2-7.0) for an average yearly center volume ≥ 6 and < 6 (P = 0.007), respectively. A combined surgeon and hospital volume variable also predicted outcomes and low-volume procedures did not meet previously proposed American Heart Association and Society for Vascular Surgery quality measures. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate an improvement in outcomes at a lower volume threshold than previously reported. These modest cutoff values should be used for asymptomatic CEA volume guideline formation and for future studies, after accounting for the impact of other important factors that may be driving volume-outcome relationships in asymptomatic CEA.

Proximal Instructions for Use Violations in Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative: Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often attempted in patients with marginal anatomy. These patients' midterm outcomes are available in the Vascular Quality Initiative for analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in the Vascular Quality Initiative from patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR between 2011 and 2018. Each EVAR was identified as either on- or off-instructions for use (IFU) based on aortic neck criteria. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, and type Ia endoleak with IFU status. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event models estimated reintervention, aneurysm sac enlargement, and overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 5,488 patients with at least 1 follow-up recorded. Those treated off-IFU included 1,236 patients ([23%] mean follow-up 401 days) compared with 4,252 (77%) treated on-IFU (mean follow-up 406 days). There was no evidence of significant differences in crude 30-day survival (96% vs 97%; p = 0.28) or estimated 2-year survival (97% vs 97%; log-rank p = 0.28). Crude type Ia endoleak frequency was greater in patients treated off IFU (2% vs 1%; p = 0.03). Off-IFU EVAR was associated with type Ia endoleak on multivariable regression model (odds ratio 1.84 [95% CI 1.23 to 2.76]; p = 0.003). Patients treated off IFU vs on IFU experienced had increased risk of reintervention within 2 years (7% vs 5%; log-rank p = 0.02), a finding consistent with results from the Cox modeling (hazard ratio 1.38 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.81]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated off IFU were at greater risk for type Ia endoleak and reintervention, although they had similar 2-year survival compared with those treated on IFU. Patients with anatomy outside IFU should be considered for open surgery or complex endovascular repair to reduce the probability for revision.

Structured discharge documentation reduces sex-based disparities in statin prescription in vascular surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative statin use has been shown to improve survival in vascular surgery patients. In 2018, the Northern California Vascular Study Group implemented a quality initiative focused on the use of a SmartText in the discharge summary. We hypothesized that structured discharge documentation would decrease sex-based disparities in evidence-based medical therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using Vascular Quality Initiative eligible cases at a single institution. Open or endovascular procedures in the abdominal aorta or lower extremity arteries from 2016 to 2021 were included. Bivariate analysis identified factors associated with statin use and sex. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the end point of statin prescription at discharge and aspirin prescription at discharge. An interaction term assessed the differential impact of the initiative on both sexes. Analysis was then stratified by prior aspirin or statin prescription. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the trend in statin prescription over time. RESULTS: Overall, 866 patients were included, including 292 (34%) female and 574 (66%) male patients. Before implementation, statins were prescribed in 77% of male and 62% of female patients (P < .01). After implementation, there was no statistically significant difference in statin prescription (91% in male vs 92% in female patients, P = .68). Female patients saw a larger improvement in the adjusted odds of statin prescription compared with male patients (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.6, P = .04). For patients not prescribed a statin preoperatively, female patients again saw an even larger improvement in the odds of being prescribed a statin at discharge (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-22.7, P < .01). Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated a sustained improvement in the frequency of prescription for both sexes over time. The unadjusted frequency of aspirin prescription also improved by 3.5% in male patients vs 5.5% in female patients. For patients not prescribed an aspirin preoperatively, we found that the frequency of aspirin prescription significantly improved for both male (19% increase, P = .006) and female (31% increase, P = .001) patients. There was no significant difference in the perioperative outcomes between male and female patients before and after standardized discharge documentation. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, low-cost regional quality improvement initiative eliminated sex-based disparities in statin prescription at a single institution. These findings highlight the meaningful impact of regional quality improvement projects. Future studies should examine the potential for structured discharge documentation to improve patient outcomes and reduce disparities.

Anemia is associated with higher mortality and morbidity after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether preoperative anemia is independently associated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes. Using a national vascular surgery database, we evaluated the associations between preoperative anemia and 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival for patients undergoing TEVAR. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who had undergone TEVAR for aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer, hematoma, or thrombus between January 2011 and December 2019. We excluded patients with a ruptured aneurysm, traumatic dissection, emergent repair, treated aorta distal to zone 5, polycythemia, transfusion of >4 U of packed red blood cells intraoperatively or postoperatively, and missing data on hemoglobin level or surgical indications. The final study cohort was dichotomized into two groups: normal/mild anemia (women, ≥10 g/dL; men, ≥12 g/dL) and moderate/severe anemia (women, <10 g/dL; male, <12 g/dL). Propensity scores by stratification were used to control for confounding in the analysis of the association between the outcomes of 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival and a binary indicator variable of moderate/severe anemia vs normal/mild anemia. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare the 1-year survival between the two groups. A Cox regression model was fitted to assess the associations between anemia and survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3391 patients were analyzed, 958 (28.3%) of whom had had moderate/severe anemia. After adjustment for multiple clinical factors using propensity score stratification, moderate/severe anemia was associated with a 141% increased odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-5.05; P = .019), 58% increased odds of any in-hospital complication (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.13; P = .003), 281% increased odds of intraoperative transfusion (aOR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.68-5.53; P < .001). In addition, moderate/severe anemia was associated with significantly worse survival within the first year after TEVAR (log-rank P < .001; 1-year survival rate using Kaplan-Meier estimates, 86.4% ± 1.3% standard error vs 92.5% ± 0.6% standard error) and with an increased risk of mortality in the first postoperative year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: We found that moderate or severe anemia is associated with significantly increased odds of mortality, postoperative complications, and worse 1-year survival after TEVAR. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effect of anemia correction on the outcomes of TEVAR.

Association of Intraoperative and Perioperative Transfusions with Postoperative Cardiovascular Events and Mortality After Infrainguinal Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing open or endovascular infrainguinal revascularization are at an elevated risk for postoperative cardiovascular complications due to high rates of comorbidities and the physiologic stress of surgery. Transfusions are known to be associated with adverse events but knowledge of specific risks associated with transfusion timing, product type, and long-term outcomes while accounting for preoperative cardiovascular risk factors is not well understood in this population. This study aimed to characterize the association of intraoperative and perioperative transfusion, anemia, and cardiovascular risk factors with cardiovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was performed on 564 infrainguinal revascularization procedures, including both open (n = 250) and endovascular (n = 314) approaches (2016-2020). Comprehensive clinical data were collected including patient demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, preoperative hemoglobin, and detailed transfusion data. Multivariable logistic regression tested the association of transfusions with composite 30-day outcomes of cardiac complications (postoperative myocardial infarction [postop-MI], congestive heart failure, or dysrhythmia) and with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-postop-MI or death). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling examined the association of transfusions, anemia, and cardiovascular risk factors with mortality up to 1 year. RESULTS: Intraoperative transfusion was performed in 15% of cases and 13% underwent transfusion in the early postoperative period. Intraoperative transfusion was associated with higher Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), lower preoperative hemoglobin, increased blood loss, and open procedures (all P < 0.05). Within each RCRI score, intraoperative transfusion was associated with 2-4-fold increased MACE at 30 days. Intraoperative packed red blood cells transfusion and early postoperative packed red blood cells transfusion was associated with more than 2-fold adjusted odds of any cardiovascular complication and intraoperative transfusion was also associated with MACE (all P < 0.05). Intraoperative transfusion was associated with mortality at 1 year on unadjusted analysis, but after adjustment for RCRI, age, and preoperative hemoglobin, only RCRI scores of 2 and 3+ and preoperatively hemoglobin remained significant risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative and early perioperative transfusions are strongly associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes after infrainguinal revascularization. These findings may have a prognostic value for further risk stratifying patients perioperatively at a high risk for complications. However, prospective studies are needed to elucidate whether optimizing transfusion strategies mitigates these risks.

Cognitive Impairment is Common in a Veterans Affairs Population with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the shared pathogenesis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and vascular dementia, there are little data on cognitive impairment in PAD patients. We hypothesized that cognitive impairment will be common and previously unrecognized. METHODS: Cognitive impairment screening was prospectively performed for veterans presenting to a single Veterans Affairs outpatient vascular surgery clinic from 2020-2021 for PAD consultation or disease surveillance. Overall, 125 Veterans were screened. Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of <26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) survey. A multivariable logistic regression assessed for independent risk factors for cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Overall, 77 (61%) had cognitive impairment, 92% was previously unrecognized. Cognitive impairment was associated with increased age (74.4 vs. 71.8 years, P = 0.03), Black versus White race (94% vs. 54%, P < 0.01), hypertension (66% vs. 31%, P = 0.01), prior stroke/TIA (79% vs. 58%, P = 0.03), diabetes treated with insulin (79% vs. 58%, P = 0.05), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (80% vs. 57%, P = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for newly diagnosed cognitive impairment included age ≥70 years, diabetes treated with insulin, PTSD, and Black race. CONCLUSIONS: Many veterans with PAD have evidence of cognitive impairment and is overwhelmingly underdiagnosed. This study suggests cognitive impairment is an unrecognized issue in a VA population with PAD, requiring more study to determine cognitive impairment's impact on surgical outcomes, and how it can be mitigated and incorporated into clinical care.

Racial and ethnic disparities in major adverse limb events persist for chronic limb threatening ischemia despite presenting limb threat severity after peripheral vascular intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-documented in the outcomes for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). One purported explanation has been the disease severity at presentation. We hypothesized that the disparities in major adverse limb events (MALE) after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI would persist despite controlling for disease severity at presentation using the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection) stage. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI dataset (2016-2021) was queried for CLTI. Patients were excluded if they were missing the WIfI stage. The primary end point was the incidence of 1-year MALE, defined as major amputation (through the tibia or fibula or more proximally) or reintervention (endovascular or surgical) of the initial treatment limb. A multivariate hierarchical Fine-Gray analysis was performed, controlling for hospital variation, competing risk of death, and presenting WIfI stage, to assess the independent association of Black/African American race and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity with MALE. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the 1-year survival analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 47,830 patients (60%) had had WIfI scores reported (73% White, 20% Black, and 7% Latinx). The 1-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of MALE was 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6%-13.5%) for White, 14.3% (95% CI, 13.5%-15.3%) for Black, and 17.0% (95% CI, 15.3%-18.9%) for Latinx patients. On bivariate analysis, the occurrence of MALE was significantly associated with younger age, Black race, Latinx ethnicity, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, dialysis, intervention level, any prior minor or major amputation, and WIfI stage (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of 1-year MALE increased by increasing WIfI stage: stage 1, 11.7% (95% CI, 10.9%-12.4%); stage 2, 12.4% (95% CI, 11.8%-13.0%); stage 3, 14.8% (95% CI, 13.8%-15.8%); and stage 4, 15.4% (95% CI, 14.3%-16.6%). The cumulative incidence also increased by intervention level: inflow, 10.7% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.7%), femoropopliteal, 12.3% (95% CI, 11.7%-12.9%); and infrapopliteal, 14.1% (95% CI, 13.5%-14.8%). After adjustment for WIfI stage only, Black race (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.44; P < .001) and Latinx ethnicity (SHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.81; P < .001) were associated with an increased 1-year hazard of MALE compared with White race. On adjusted multivariable analysis, MALE disparities persisted for Black/African American race (SHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25; P = .028) and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity (SHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54; P < .001) compared with White race. CONCLUSIONS: Black/African American and Latinx/Hispanic patients had a higher associated hazard of MALE after PVI for CLTI compared with White patients despite an adjustment for WIfI stage at presentation. These results suggest that disease severity at presentation does not account for disparities in outcomes. Further work should focus on better understanding the underlying mechanisms for disparities in historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups presenting with CLTI.

Clinical Predictors and Outcomes Associated with Postoperative Delirium Following Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative delirium (POD) is common yet often underdiagnosed following vascular surgery. Elderly patients with advanced peripheral artery disease may be at particular risk for POD yet understanding of the clinical predictors and impact of POD is incomplete. We sought to identify POD predictors and associated resource utilization after infrainguinal lower extremity bypass. METHODS: This single center retrospective analysis included all infrainguinal bypass cases performed for peripheral arterial disease from 2012-2020. The primary outcome was inpatient POD. Delirium sequelae were also evaluated. Key secondary outcomes were length of stay, nonhome discharge, readmission, 30-day amputation, post-operative myocardial infarction, mortality, and 2-year survival. Regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for delirium in addition to association with 2-year survival and amputation free survival. RESULTS: Among 420 subjects undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass, 105 (25%) developed POD. Individuals with POD were older and more likely to have non-elective surgery (P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of POD were age 60-89 years old, chronic limb threatening ischemia, female sex, and nonelective procedure. Consultations for POD took place for 25 cases (24%); 13 (52%) were with pharmacists, and only 4 (16%) resulted in recommendations. The average length of stay for those with POD was higher (17 days vs. 9 days; P < 0.001). POD was associated with increased non-home discharge (61.8% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.001), 30-day major amputation (6.7% vs. 1.6%; P < 0.01), 30-day postoperative myocardial infarction (11.4% vs. 4.1%; P < 0.01), and 90-day mortality (7.6% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.03). Survival at 2 years was lower in those with delirium (89% vs. 75%; P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards model, delirium was independently associated with decreased survival (HR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.15-3.38; P = 0.014) and decreased major-amputation free survival (HR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.18-2.96; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: POD is common following infrainguinal lower extremity bypass and is associated with other adverse post-operative outcomes and increased resource utilization, including increased hospital length of stay, nonhome discharge, and worse 2-year survival. Future studies should evaluate the role of routine multidisciplinary care for high-risk patients to improve perioperative outcomes for vulnerable older adults undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass.

Capturing the complexity of open abdominal aortic surgery in the endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: Volume and quality benchmarks for open abdominal aortic surgery and particularly open aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) in the endovascular era are guided by the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, but the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) OAR module fails to capture the full spectrum of complex OAR. We hypothesized that VQI-ineligible complex OAR would be the dominant form of open repairs performed at a VQI-participating tertiary center. METHODS: All OAR cases performed at a single tertiary care center from 2007 to 2020 were reviewed. The VQI OAR criteria were applied with exclusions (non-VQI) defined as concomitant renal bypass, clamping above the superior mesenteric artery or celiac artery, repairs performed for trauma, anastomotic aneurysm, isolated iliac aneurysm, or infected aneurysms. Linear regression was used to assess temporal trends. RESULTS: Among a total of 481 open abdominal aortic operations, 355 (74%) were OAR. The average annual OAR volume remained stable over 14 years (25 ± 6; P = .46). Non-VQI OAR comprised 54% of all cases and persisted over time (R2 = 0.047, P = .46). Supraceliac clamping (35%) was often necessary. The proportion of endograft explantation cases significantly increased over time from 4% in 2007 to 20% in 2019 (P = .01). Infectious indications represented 20% (n = 70) of cases. Visceral branch grafts were performed in 16% of all cases. OAR for ruptured aneurysm constituted 10% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in non-VQI vs VQI-eligible OAR cases (10% vs 4%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Complex OAR comprises a majority of OAR cases in a contemporary tertiary referral hospital, yet these cases are not accounted for in the VQI. Creation of a "complex OAR" VQI module would capture these cases in a quality-driven national registry and help to better inform benchmarks for volume and outcomes in aortic surgery.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after vascular surgery and implications for chemoprophylaxis strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, the reported incidence after major vascular surgery has ranged from as low as 1% to >10%. Furthermore, little is known about optimal chemoprophylaxis regimens or rates of postdischarge VTE in this population. In the present study, we aimed to better characterize the rates of in-hospital and postdischarge VTE after major vascular surgery, the role of chemoprophylaxis timing, and the association of VTE with mortality. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of 1449 major vascular operations (2013-2020) was performed and included 189 endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (13%), 169 thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (12%), 318 open aortic operations (22%), 640 lower extremity bypasses (44%), and 133 femoral endarterectomies (9%). The baseline characteristics, anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, and outcomes were abstracted from an electronic database with medical record auditing. Postoperative VTE (pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis) within 90 days of surgery was classified by the location, symptoms, and treatment. A cut point analysis using Youden's index identified the most VTE discriminating timing of chemoprophylaxis (including therapeutic vs prophylactic anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications) and Caprini score. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association of VTE with chemoprophylaxis timing, Caprini score, and additional risk factors. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to measure the association between VTE and mortality. RESULTS: The overall VTE incidence was 3.4% (65% deep vein thrombosis; 25% pulmonary embolism; 10% both), and 37% had occurred after discharge. The rate of symptomatic VTE was 2.4%, which was lowest for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (0.0%) and highest for open aortic surgery (4.1%; P = .02). Those who had developed VTE had had a longer length of stay, higher rates of end-stage renal disease and prior VTE, and higher Caprini scores (8 vs 5 points; P < .01 for all). Those who had developed VTE were also more likely to have received ≥2 U of blood postoperatively, required an unplanned return to the operating room, had delayed chemoprophylaxis, anticoagulation, and/or antiplatelet initiation of >4 days postoperatively, and had increased 90-day mortality (P < .01 for all). A Caprini score of ≥7 (29% of patients) was associated with postdischarge VTE (2.6% vs 0.7%; P = .01), and chemoprophylaxis, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet timing of >4 days was associated with an increased adjusted odds of VTE (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.9). Although no fatal VTEs were identified, VTE was an independent predictor of 90-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.9). CONCLUSIONS: These data have shown that patients undergoing major vascular surgery are particularly prone to the development of VTE, with frequent hypercoagulable comorbidities. The earlier initiation of chemoprophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of VTE development. Furthermore, the postdischarge VTE rates might reach thresholds warranting postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, especially for patients with a Caprini score of ≥7.

Endovascular treatment of high-risk peripheral vascular occlusive lesions: a review of current evidence and emerging applications of intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and paclitaxel-coated devices.

Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease has evolved and expanded rapidly over the last 20 years. New technologies have increased the diversity of devices available and have made it possible to approach even the most challenging and high-risk lesions using endovascular techniques. In this review, we examine the clinical evidence available for several categories of endovascular devices available to treat peripheral arterial disease, including intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and drug-coated devices. The best application for some technologies, such as intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomies, have yet to be identified. In contrast, drug-coated devices have an established role in patients at high risk for long-term failure, but have been the subject of much controversy, given recent concerns about possible adverse effects of paclitaxel. Future investigation should further assess these technologies in patients with complex disease using updated staging systems and outcomes with direct clinical relevance, such as functional improvement, wound healing, and freedom from recurrent symptoms.

Racial Disparities Associated With Reinterventions After Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: There are substantial racial and socioeconomic disparities underlying endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the United States. To date, race-based variations in reinterventions following elective EVAR have not been studied. Here, we aim to examine racial disparities associated with reinterventions following elective EVAR in a real-world cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Vascular Quality Initiative EVAR dataset to identify all patients undergoing elective EVAR between January 2009 and December 2018 in the United States. We compared the association of race with reinterventions after EVAR and all-cause mortality using Welch two-sample t-tests, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusting for baseline differences between groups. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 1.1 ± 1.1 y (1.3 ± 1.4 y Black, 1.1 ± 1.1 y White; P = 0.02), a total of 1,164 of 42,481 patients (2.7%) underwent reintervention after elective EVAR, including 2.7% (n = 1,096) White versus 3.2% (n = 68) Black (P = 0.21). Black patients requiring reintervention were more frequently female, more frequently current or former smokers, and less frequently insured by Medicare/Medicaid (P < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline differences, the risk of reintervention after elective EVAR was significantly lower for Black versus White patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99; P = 0.04). All-cause mortality was comparable between groups (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.33-2.00, P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences between Black and White patients in the risk of reintervention after elective EVAR in the United States. The etiology of this difference deserves investigation.

Aortic Neck IFU Violations During EVAR for Ruptured Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms are Associated with Increased In-Hospital Mortality.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons treating patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm must make rapid treatment decisions and sometimes lack immediate access to endovascular devices meeting the anatomic specifications of the patient at hand. We hypothesized that endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rEVAR) outside manufacturer instructions-for-use (IFU) guidelines would have similar in-hospital mortality compared to patients treated on-IFU or with an infrarenal clamp during open repair (ruptured open aortic aneurysm repair [rOAR]). METHODS: Vascular Quality Initiative datasets for endovascular and open aortic repair were queried for patients presenting with ruptured infrarenal AAA between 2013-2018. Graft-specific IFU criteria were correlated with case-specific proximal neck dimension data to classify rEVAR cases as on- or off-IFU. Univariate comparisons between the on- and off-IFU groups were performed for demographic, operative and in-hospital outcome variables. To investigate mortality differences between rEVAR and rOAR approaches, coarsened exact matching was used to match patients receiving off-IFU rEVAR with those receiving complex rEVAR (requiring at least one visceral stent or scallop) or rOAR with infrarenal, suprarenal or supraceliac clamps. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 621 patients were treated with rEVAR, with 65% classified as on-IFU and 35% off-IFU. The off-IFU group was more frequently female (25% vs. 18%, P = 0.05) and had larger aneurysms (76 vs. 72 mm, P= 0.01) but otherwise was not statistically different from the on-IFU cohort. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients treated off-IFU vs. on-IFU (22% vs. 14%, P= 0.02). Off-IFU rEVAR was associated with longer operative times (135 min vs. 120 min, P= 0.004) and increased intraoperative blood product utilization (2 units vs. 1 unit, P= 0.002). When off-IFU patients were matched to complex rEVAR and rOAR patients, no baseline differences were found between the groups. Overall in-hospital complications associated with off-IFU were reduced compared to more complex strategies (43% vs. 60-81%, P< 0.001) and in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for off-IFU rEVAR patients compared to the supraceliac clamp group (18% vs. 38%, P= 0.006). However, there was no significantly increased mortality associated with complex rEVAR, infrarenal rOAR or suprarenal rOAR compared to off-IFU rEVAR (all P> 0.05). This finding persisted in a multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Off-IFU rEVAR yields inferior in-hospital survival compared to on-IFU rEVAR but remains associated with reduced in-hospital complications when compared with more complex repair strategies. When compared with matched patients undergoing rOAR with an infrarenal or suprarenal clamp, survival was no different from off-IFU rEVAR. Taken together with the growing available evidence suggesting reduced long-term durability of off-IFU EVAR, these data suggest that a patient's comorbidity burden should be key in making the decision to pursue off-IFU rEVAR over a more complex repair when proximal neck violations are anticipated preoperatively.

Closure device use for common femoral artery antegrade access is higher risk than retrograde access.

OBJECTIVE: Although the use of closure devices (CD) for femoral artery antegrade access (AA) is not in the instructions for use (IFU) for many devices, AA has been reported to be associated with a lower incidence of access site complications compared to manual compression alone. We hypothesized that CD use for AA would not be associated with a clinically significant increased odds of access site complications compared to CD use for retrograde access (RA). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2019 for infrainguinal peripheral vascular interventions with common femoral artery access closed with a CD. Patients who had a cutdown or multiple access sites were excluded. Cases were then stratified into whether access was antegrade or retrograde. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regressions controlling for hospital level variation were used to examine the independent association between AA and access site complications. The primary outcomes were access site hematoma, stenosis, or occlusion as defined in the VQI. The secondary outcome was the development of an access site hematoma requiring an intervention, which was defined as transfusion, thrombin injection, or surgery. Sensitivity analyses after coarsened exact matching were performed to reduce residual bias. RESULTS: Overall, 72,463 cases were identified and 6,070 (8.4%) had AA. Patients with AA were less likely to be smokers (27.2% vs 33.0%) or obese (31.5% vs 35.6%; all P<0.05). Patients with AA were more likely to be on dialysis (12.8% vs 10.1%) and have ultrasound-guided access (76.4% vs 66.2%; P<0.05 for all). Compared to RA, patients with AA were more likely to develop any access site hematoma (2.5% vs 1.8%; P<0.01) and a hematoma requiring intervention (0.7% vs 0.5%; P=0.03), but had no difference in access site stenosis or occlusion (0.3% vs 0.2%; P=0.21). On multivariable analyses, AA had increased odds of developing any access site hematoma (OR=1.46; 95% CI=1.22-1.76) and a hematoma requiring intervention (OR=1.48; 95% CI=1.10-1.98). Sensitivity analyses after coarsened exact matching confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: In this nationally representative sample, the use of CDs for femoral access was associated with an overall low rate of access site complications. However, there was an increased odds of access site hematomas with AA. Patient selection for AA remains important and ultrasound guided access should be the standard of care for this approach.